What is the implication of written consent from the insurer in transfer of shares?

Written consent from the insurer signifies formal approval for the transfer of shares, which is often required to ensure compliance with regulations and policy terms. When consent is granted, it confirms that the insurer has reviewed the transfer details and finds them acceptable, thus making the transfer effective. This is a crucial step in many insurance agreements, as it protects both the insurer's interests and the rights of the policyholders.

The other options address different scenarios that do not align with the standard implications of obtaining written consent. Delaying the approval process is not the objective of securing consent; rather, it streamlines the transition of ownership. Declaring the transfer void would imply that there was either no consent or an issue with the transfer itself, which isn't the case when consent is granted. Denying claims is unrelated to the transfer of shares; claims are typically dependent on the terms of the policy, not on the status of shares.